DIS/FUNCTIONAL
Curator's Essay
DIS/FUNCTIONAL
Seven Installations
Why is it that humans need to make their mark on their
environment? From the caves of prehistoric Altamira
to the tombs of ancient Egypt, from the paintings of
the Sistine chapel to graffiti-choked walls of Southeast
L.A., we seem compelled to alter the spaces around us.
The reasons for these artistic alterations are as varied
and complex as human nature itself. They may arise from
some inexplicable primal urge, or perhaps, in the case
of ritual environments, an underlying need to worship
a higher source. More often than not, they are intended
to influence our thinking or behavior.
But who interprets the purpose or meaning of what are,
at least to our eyes, essentially aesthetic manifestations?
Ordinarily, anthropologists, archaeologists and related
experts try to establish rational or scientific explanations
for these creative endeavors. Their explanations and
extrapolations may then be printed in text books, where
they acquire the authority of the written word. Readers
of these texts may accept their authority assuming that
this knowledge is absolute truth, even though the authors
of these texts are themselves human, with the biases,
prejudices and preconceptions that plague all humans.
Dis/Functional, an exhibition of installation art, casts
the artist, rather than the scientist, in the role of
expert authority and aesthetic interpreter. Just as
anthropologists, archaeologists, sociologists and historians
grapple with persistent issues of religion, social and
sexual relationships, education, politics and technology,
the artists in this exhibition attempt to create a dialogue
with the viewer about these subjects. Unlike scientists,
however, their work leaves these issues open to individual
interpretation, rather than striving to establish any
"absolute truth". Though scientific pronouncements may
once have been accepted as black and white, and essentially
unassailable, current post-modern skepticism now informs
our approach to these areas. This exhibition underscores
the prevailing skepticism of our time.
What ultimately unites the artists of Dis/Functional
is the medium of installation. The seven artists selected
alter space to focus their audience visually upon questions
of function and purpose. They incite the viewer to creative
thought, sparking debate on problematic matters, rather
than promoting complacent acceptance of pat answers
and generally accepted truisms.
It was around the turn of the century that examination
of social and physical space began to take its contemporary
roots in the art world. As early as 1913, the Russian
Constructivists rejected the flatness of conventional
easel painting and the mass of traditional sculpture
in favor of constructions using industrial materials
that became not just objects in neutral space, but a
treatment of space itself as a work of art. Artists
aligned with Europe's Dada movement noisily rejected
the concept of art having to be embodied in a precious
object; they successfully used mixed media and sculpture-based
work made from refuse, cast-offs and other unconventional
materials to criticize the mores of middle class society.
Almost simultaneously, artists of the German Bauhaus
movement sought to combine architecture, sculpture,
painting and crafts, in an attempt to rethink the age-old
boundaries separating these disciplines and to harness
art in the cause of functionalism. Later, in the 1960's,
"happenings" spawned by Fluxus and Pop Art began to
deal with issues of surroundings and created environments;
they were the precursors of what is now labelled installation
art.
It was not until the 1970's, and the advent of work
by such artists as Nam June Paik, Judy Chicago, Chris
Burden, Annette Messager, Bill Viola and Robert Irwin,
that the contemporary definition of installation became
a part of standard art-world vocabulary. An installation
originally was defined as a site-specific work in which
every element in the space becomes a part of the total
object or environment.
Today, with the development of technology and the acknowledgment
by artists that work, practically speaking, must have
portability to been seen in numerous venues, the definition
of installation art has taken on an even broader range
of meaning. Artists working in installation form have
been forced to address the function of their medium,
as well as basic thematic concerns. They have taken
more flexible approaches to their creations, making
work originally intended to be site-specific adjustable
to new locations; conversely, they work smaller in scale,
making it easier for a piece to travel or to be acquired
by an institution. Installation has been forced into
sub-categorization by its very flexibility. It now divides
into areas such as mixed media, sculptural-based work,
and video installation, making the question of just
what installation is more difficult. Is Vernon Fisher's
Basutoland traditional installation or sculpture and
how would it have been described before 1970? This is
one of the main purposes of Dis/Functional: to reassess
traditional definitions of this relatively new medium
and to bring home the point that, as technologies and
societies change, so do definitions.
Vernon Fisher and Dan Collins directly address the advancement
of technology and its ramifications. In Basutoland,
Fisher examines the modernist notion that it is natural
to want to advance and that advancement will bring positive
results. However, such technological progress can have
a negative flip side. For example, having the newest
version of a computer software program may sound great,
but not if the software fails to interface with the
old version on the computer at work. And being so technologically
advanced that one can create a reproduction may not
be as good as having the original, an idea forwarded
in Collins' (Re)inventing the Wheel. In this installation,
Collins confronts a hotly disputed issue in cyberspace:
whether going to the source is still the best form of
obtaining information or whether digital reproduction
and packaging of that information provides more insight.
Technological advancement can create other problems,
such as that of power, and its orollary, control. Table
for Hegelian Heroes at a Business Lunch; Dining Room
Storm Also Applicable to the Domestic
Front by Francesc Torres explores issues surrounding
war and conflict. Does the individual who makes the
rules for the game actually suffer the often devastating
consequences of those rules? Essentially the same question
is raised in Joyan Saunders' work, Athlete Heart. Saunders'
work addresses the question of control within contemporary
human relationships and the monumental struggle that
can occur in trying to define each partner's role and
function within that relationship. A different type
of control is investigated in Barbara Penn's A Science
-- So the Savants Say. Here, the subject of control
is placed in the context of education, with the artist
asserting that the teaching/learning experience, a classic
control situation, is often devoid of the "heart" critical
to real effectiveness.
The nature of religion becomes the focal point of Herb
Stratford's Cross Boxes. Through the juxtaposition of
traditional religious and superstitious iconography,
the artist questions the role of the religious object
in our society. Stratford's work looks at the qualities
that link an object to divinity and asks the viewer
to determine whether an object can be inherently divine
or whether mere luck plays a role in imbuing it with
sacredness.
Truisms, Jenny Holzer's tiny LED read-out, captures
the essence of Dis/Functional. Holzer's piece addresses
issues the other artists in the exhibition examine through
seven simple, yet profound, statements about society.
The artist puts these bold declarations before us in
detached technological format., challenging us to draw
our own conclusions about them based upon our own individual
beliefs and experiences.
Not unlike Holzer's LED and the other work in this exhibition,
Dis/Functional seeks to make viewers question their
preconceived notions about the environment that surrounds
them, even the museum environment in which this exhibition
has been mounted. Traditionally, a museum patron might
expect the usual images of art hung neatly on walls
in symmetrical layouts. Study for a moment the environment
of Dis/Functional: large negative spaces, empty major
walls, everyday objects placed out of context or used
in unforeseen ways. Think about this different approach
to the use of space and the new functions assigned to
objects incorporated in the art on display. This is
what Dis/Functional is all about.
John D. Spiak
Curator of the exhibition
Curatorial Museum Specialist
For more information contact John Spiak at spiak@asu.edu.
ASU | Herberger College | ASU Art Museum | Internal Resources | Staff Directory
